Legal Opinion
State v. Christiansen
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of larceny in a dwelling house.
The first assignment of error is that the following indictment fails to allege facts sufficient to constitute a crime:
“Carl Christiansen is accused by the Grand Jury of the county of Wallowa by this indictment of the crime of larceny in a dwelling house committed as follows:
“The said Carl Christiansen on the 25th day of November, A. D. 1933, in the said county of Wallowa and state of Oregon, then and there being did then and there at the same time and place take, steal and carry away in a dwelling house, certain personal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MinnickOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. KeelenOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. BasingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- State of Oregon v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Daugharty v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959