Legal Opinion
MacKinder v. OSCA Development Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1984No. Civ. 29510PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Defendant OSCA Development Company (OSCA), doing business as Desert Crest Country Club, initiated a small claims action against plaintiffs Robert and Edna Mackinder for fees allegedly due pursuant to a recorded declaration of restrictions. Plaintiffs, contending an earlier small claims judgment was res judicata and the declaration of restrictions does not apply to them, filed in the Riverside Superior Court the instant action for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and injunctive relief. OSCA cross-complained for declaratory…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Heather Farms Homeowners Assn. v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Huntington Landmark Adult Community Ass'n v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Jones v. Union Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Track Mortgage Group, Inc. v. Crusader InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Damian v. TamondongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.