Legal Opinion

Littmann v. Littmann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1973No. 317PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Sec. 262.19, Stats., was adopted by the legislature in its present form in 1960. It has not been before this court for interpretation. Under ordinary rules of practice, an order denying a stay of proceedings is not appealable since, under sec. 274.33 (1), it neither determines the action nor prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken. However, this order is made appealable by secs. 262.19 (2) and 274.33 (3).

It should be noted at the outset that the defendants misunderstand the alternatives available to them under sec. 262.19. That statute does not, and could not, au thorize the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Wilcox v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Thomson v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Boodry v. ByrneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Goodwine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. ComstockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Motor Inn Management, Inc. v. Irvin-Fuller Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Johnson v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Mayer v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API