Legal Opinion

Norton v. Town of Islip

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 2, 2003No. CV 98-06745(NGG)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GARAUFIS, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Howard Norton brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the above-captioned Defendants violated his due process rights when they revoked his right to maintain a legal nonconforming use of his property without notice and an opportunity to be heard. The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment. For purposes of efficiency, I consider these motions together.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted. Plaintiff is the owner of a house (the “Premises”) in Central Islip…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cathedral Church of the Intercessor v. Incorporated Village of MalverneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  2. Norton v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Ahmed v. Town of Oyster BayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  4. Eason v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF BOULDERColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Bain v. Town of ArgyleDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API