Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Howell v. Schiele, Treas.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1949No. 7123PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATTHEWS, J.:

In this action the relator invokes the original jurisdiction of this court in mandamus to compel the respondent, the Treasurer of the City of Cincinnati, to issue to him a license to conduct the calling of a professional bondsman in accordance with Section 722-2 of the municipal ordinances, which reads as follows:

“Any responsible person or firm may obtain from the City Treasurer, a license to do business as a professional bondsman on payment of an annual license fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00) and the furnishing of a surety bond in accordance with the provisions of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. United States v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1909
  3. United States v. SimmonsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. American Bail Bond AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Summit Fidelity & Surety Co. of Akron, Ohio v. NimtzNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. OhayonOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. ShadboltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API