Legal Opinion
State, Ex Rel. Howell v. Schiele, Treas.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 5, 1949No. 7123PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.:
In this action the relator invokes the original jurisdiction of this court in mandamus to compel the respondent, the Treasurer of the City of Cincinnati, to issue to him a license to conduct the calling of a professional bondsman in accordance with Section 722-2 of the municipal ordinances, which reads as follows:
“Any responsible person or firm may obtain from the City Treasurer, a license to do business as a professional bondsman on payment of an annual license fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00) and the furnishing of a surety bond in accordance with the provisions of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- United States v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1909
- United States v. SimmonsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. American Bail Bond AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Summit Fidelity & Surety Co. of Akron, Ohio v. NimtzNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. OhayonOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. ShadboltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.