Legal Opinion

In re the Tax Appeal of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1972No. 5118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LEVINSON, J.

During the tax. years 1963 through 1967, the business *451activities of A & B Commercial Company, a division of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and the taxpayer herein, included 1) the sale of radio, television and refrigeration appliance parts to licensed repairmen, 2) the sale of imported appliance parts directly to consumers in conjunction with repair work performed by the taxpayer, and 3) the sale of paint to licensed taxpayers in the automobile painting business. The taxpayer originally reported receipts from sales of parts to its customers in the appliance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Leather & Finding Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Doby v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Central Television Service, Inc. v. IsaacsIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. C. & E. Marshall Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Tax Appeal of Fuji Photo Film Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In re the Tax Appeal of Otis Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In re the Tax Appeal of Photo Management, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In re the Tax Appeal of Otis Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API