Legal Opinion

C. & E. Marshall Co. v. Ames

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1940No. 25367. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shaw

The Director of Finance appeals from a decree of the circuit court of Cook county which restrains him from applying the Retailers’ Occupation Tax act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, chap. 120, secs. 440 et seq.) to the occupations of appellees. These appellees are in the business of selling jeweler’s supplies to persons and firms engaged in the business of assembling and repairing watches and clocks.

The only controverted question is whether or not in selling watch and clock parts to repairmen the appellees are making sales for use and consumption. The answer to this question depends on whether these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradley Supply Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. American Optical Co. v. NudelmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Modern Dairy Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Colbert Mill & Feed Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Department of Revenue v. Jennison-Wright Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People Ex Rel. Swartchild & Co. v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In re the Tax Appeal of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API