In re the Tax Appeal of Otis Elevator Co.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
*177DISSENTING OPINION OF
KIDWELL, J. WITH WHOM MENOR, J., JOINS
I am unable to agree with the opinion by which the judgment of the tax appeal court is affirmed in this case. Although lengthy dissents are to be avoided, I feel that there is a need to express the minority viewpoint in this case at greater length than would ordinarily be appropriate.
The issue dealt with in part I of the plurality opinion relates to the use tax rate applicable to parts imported by the taxpayer (Otis) for use in the course of maintenance and repair work. The tax appeal court concluded that these parts were not sold at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Matter of Puna Sugar Company, LimitedHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- In re the Tax Appeal of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1972