Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Callahan
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLANDER, Judge.
The common issue presented here concerns the determination of when appellees, who are 33 former Westinghouse Electric Corporation employees, became unemployed for purposes of entitlement to unemployment compensation benefits.1 The Hearing Examiner of the Department of Economic and Employment Development (“DEED”) concluded that all 33 *28appellees were qualified to collect unemployment insurance benefits as of the time that they were prospectively notified by Westinghouse, the appellant here, that their jobs would be abolished. Thereafter, pursuant to Md.Code Ann., Labor and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Baltimore Lutheran High School Ass'n v. Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Department of Economic & Employment Development v. TaylorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Travers v. Baltimore Police DepartmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Department of Economic & Employment Development v. LilleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Brzowski v. Maryland Home Improvement CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Mayberry v. Board of EducationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.