Legal Opinion
Purdy v. MOISE
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 14, 1953No. 16734PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, Justice.
On July 11, 1949, the city of Sumter, South Carolina, adopted a zoning ordinance which was in full force and effect in 1952 when respondent applied for a permit to construct a “tourist court” or “motor court” on certain property affected by the following regulations as set forth in the ordinance:
“II (A) Use Regulations: In the residence district no buildings, or land shall be used and no building shall be here after erected or structurally altered, unless otherwise provided in this ordinance, except for the following uses:
“(1) One-family dwellings, two-family dwellings,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Matter of Monument Garage Corp. v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Pinkerton v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Fay v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Leonard v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Original Blue Ribbon Taxi Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Gurganious v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Hughes v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Clear Channel Outdoor v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.