Legal Opinion
Clark v. Milam
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided July 22, 1993No. Civ. A. 2:92-0935PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are renewed motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed pursuant to the provisions of Rule 12(b)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., by Defendants Dudley D. Alen, Frank E. Clark Jr., Michael J. Davoli, John H. Wilbur, Arthur W. Milam, Mahoney, Adams and Criser, P.A., f/k/a Mahoney, Adams, Milam, Surface and Grimsley, P.A, also f7k/a Mahoney, Hadlow and Adams, P.A, John J. McAvoy and Carolyn B. Lamm. 1 Plaintiff, West Virginia State Insurance Commissioner, seeks in this action to recover losses suffered by the now insolvent George Washington…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Clark v. MilamDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993
- Edwards v. SchwartzDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019
- State Ex Rel. Bell Atlantic-West Virginia, Inc. v. RansonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Bowers v. WurzburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Clark v. MilamDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.