Price v. Communications Workers of America Local 9503
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of dismissal in a suit claimed to be representative. The named plaintiffs are four in number. Defendant’s demurrer to the first amended complaint, called the complaint, was sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiffs did not amend and judgment of dismissal was entered. The question is: Is this a proper representative or class suit?
The complaint alleges:
Count I
1. Defendant is a union with its principal place of business in the county of Los Angeles. It is the recognized bargaining agent by Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, called the company,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Fallon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Watson v. Santa Carmelita Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Barber v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Chance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962