National Labor Relations Board v. Wilkening Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board in its decision of September 23, 1952 found respondent guilty of an unfair labor practice in refusing to bargain with the union which had been declared by the Board to be the representative of the employees. The Board seeks enforcement of its order.
The dispute dates back to the election, held April 27, 1951, for the determination of a collective bargaining representative for the unit concerned. The vote as finally certified was 26 to 24 in favor of the union. Within four days thereafter the company filed objections to the conduct of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. SidranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Huntsville Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Kingston Cake Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Globe Automatic Sprinkler Co. Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bata Shoe Company, Inc., United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Air Control Products of St. Petersburg, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sun Drug Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. Harrah's ClubCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Westchester Plastics of Ohio, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.