Legal Opinion

Anthony (Tony) Gaston v. Anna Ramirez Palmer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2006No. 01-56367PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND AMENDING OPINION

ORDER

In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Evans v. Chavis, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 846, 163 L.Ed.2d 684 (2006), we grant the petition for panel rehearing.

In Gaston v. Palmer, 417 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir.2005), we held that habeas petitioner Anthony Gaston had timely filed in federal district court. In so holding, we concluded that he was entitled to “gap” or “interval” tolling for the periods between his applications for habeas corpus in state court, and that he therefore filed within the one-year statute of limitations of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Evans v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Anthony (Tony) Gaston v. Anna Ramirez PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Bryant v. Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Joseph Stancle v. Ivan ClayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Freddy Curiel v. Amy MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Hemmerle v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API