United States v. Swanson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Petitioners Michael Swanson (Swanson) and Barbra Alexander (Alexander) (collectively the “Defendants”) appeal their convictions and Alexander’s sentence for conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1349), mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), and securities fraud (15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)), We affirm the district court’s decisions as to all claims.
1. The Quickbooks reports underlying Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) analyst David Campagnolo’s summary evidence were properly classified as business records. See U-Haul Int’l, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mut…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Weeks v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. OlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lockett v. DowlingDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022