Legal Opinion

United States v. Swanson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 30, 2017No. 14-10282, No. 14-10369PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioners Michael Swanson (Swanson) and Barbra Alexander (Alexander) (collectively the “Defendants”) appeal their convictions and Alexander’s sentence for conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1349), mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), and securities fraud (15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)), We affirm the district court’s decisions as to all claims.

1. The Quickbooks reports underlying Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) analyst David Campagnolo’s summary evidence were properly classified as business records. See U-Haul Int’l, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mut…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Weeks v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. OlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lockett v. DowlingDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API