Legal Opinion
State ex rel. McGonegle v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1996No. 94-1689PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
R.C. 4123.56(B) provides that:
“Where an employee in a claim allowed under this chapter suffers a wage loss as a result of returning to employment other than his former position of employment or as a result of being unable to find employment consistent with the *277claimant’s physical capabilities, he shall receive compensation at sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of his weekly wage loss not to exceed the statewide average weekly wage for a period not to exceed two hundred weeks.”
Supplementing the statute, Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-32(D) provides that:
“In injury claims in which the date of injury, or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Jorn v. Pigs Unlimited, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. McGonegle v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Smith v. Superior's Brand Meats, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.