Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McGonegle v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1996No. 94-1689PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

R.C. 4123.56(B) provides that:

“Where an employee in a claim allowed under this chapter suffers a wage loss as a result of returning to employment other than his former position of employment or as a result of being unable to find employment consistent with the *277claimant’s physical capabilities, he shall receive compensation at sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of his weekly wage loss not to exceed the statewide average weekly wage for a period not to exceed two hundred weeks.”

Supplementing the statute, Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-32(D) provides that:

“In injury claims in which the date of injury, or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Jorn v. Pigs Unlimited, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. McGonegle v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. Superior's Brand Meats, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API