Legal Opinion
McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton, P.A. v. Rechberger
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 15, 2002No. 00-1756 to 00-1758PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
These appeals arise from protracted litigation over attorney’s fees allegedly owed by Alfred Rechberger (“Rechberger”) and ARC Partners, Ltd. (“ARC”) to the New Hampshire law firm McLane, Graf, Rau-lerson, & Middleton, P.A. (“McLane”). Rechberger focuses on three rulings against him. First, he challenges the dis trict court’s partial summary judgment award of $135,157.77 to McLane on its contract claim because he believes that an attorney’s allegedly erroneous initial valuation of the damages exposure from the case for which the attorney was retained should relieve him…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Juan E. Cruz v. Robert Savage, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Smith v. Dorchester Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- B. Fernandez & Hnos, Inc. v. Kellogg USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Jensen v. Phillips Screw Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc. v. Capital Terminal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- VALLE-ARCE v. Puerto Rico Ports AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.