Legal Opinion
Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc. v. Capital Terminal Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 10, 2004No. 03-2324PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Per curiam
This case requires us to determine whether appellant Capital Terminal Company was entitled to reach a jury on its claim that certain improvements to a fire suppression system were required by “regulations” under the terms of its written agreement with appellee Getty Properties Corporation. At the conclusion of appellant’s case, the district court granted ap-pellee’s motion for judgment as a matter of law because, in the court’s view, appellant had failed to establish a basis for instructing the jury on the content of such regulations, and hence could not link the required improvements to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- James Newcomb v. James Brennan and Henry ReussCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- White v. GittensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc., Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton, P.A. v. RechbergerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Davila-NievesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Christi Thompson v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Lopes v. RiendeauDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Berríos-Romero v. Estado Libre Asociado De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Northern Ins. Co. of NY v. Point Judith MarinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.