Legal Opinion
Household Finance Corp. v. Pugh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 18, 1980No. 49990PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This matter involves a judgment entered by the Seventh Judicial District Court in favor of respondent Household Finance Corporation for the total unpaid balance of a note executed between respondent and appellants Jerry and Mary Ann Pugh. In so ruling, the court rejected appellants’ contention that respondent’s recovery should be reduced due to a violation of the Federal Truth in Lending Act (hereafter “TILA”), 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1601, et seq. We reverse.
On July 10, 1975, appellants and respondent entered into a consumer credit transaction in which appellants agreed to pay $2,448…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Basham v. Finance America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Household Consumer Discount Co. v. VespazianiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Beneficial Finance Co. of Atl. City v. SwaggertySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Appelbaum v. Ceres Land Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- Minex Resources, Inc. v. MorlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.