Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Lommen v. Gravlin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1941No. 32,801PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

In this proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, the information and alternative writ are challenged by respondents’ demurrers and motions to quash.

August 28, 1940, the governor, as commander-in-chief of the military and naval forces of the state, formally directed the adjutant-general to “proceed at once with the organization, training and equipping of a State Defense Force from the Unorganized Militia as provided” by 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, §§ 2399, 2404, 2407. The purpose was to create a substitute for the National Guard as and when the latter is ordered into active duty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Farrington v. WhitcombIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Oelschlegel v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. State ex rel. Childs v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. State v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State Ex Rel. Landis v. ValzSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Florida House of Representatives v. CristSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. Grozbach v. Common School District No. 65Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. White v. ClevengerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Florida House of Representatives v. CristSupreme Court of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API