Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Florida House of Representatives v. Crist

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 3, 2008No. SC07-2154Published

1ConcurrenceLewis, J.

I concur in result only based upon two aspects of the majority opinion which cause concern. First, I would conclude that the majority’s analysis and discussion with regard to the Governor’s power to enter into a compact is overly restrictive. Second, I question whether the writ of quo warranto is the appropriate remedy for the relief the majority grants today.

THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE GOVERNOR10

I cannot agree with the analysis of the majority, which is unduly restrictive with regard to the constitutional powers of the Governor as the chief executive officer of the State of Florida.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. English v. McCrarySupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Martinez v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API