Hawley v. Tolbot
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
PER OURIAM1.
This appeal is from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county; plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs below.
Plaintiffs in error in due time served and filed their briefs in full compliance with the rules of the court, but the defendants in error have wholly failed to file any brief, pleading, or to: otherwise appear in this cause upon the merits of the case, nor have they offered any excuse ff>r their failure to do so.
“Where plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City National Bank v. CoatneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Harrington v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Massey v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Diehl v. WelshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Halbach v. Parkhill Truck Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.