Legal Opinion
City of Atlanta v. Smith
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 15, 1927No. 5845PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
1. The rulings of the Supreme Court on questions of law, upon the interlocutory order of the trial judge granting an injunction, become the ,law of the case in so far as the case depends upon such questions of law. Ingram v. Trustees of Mercer University, 102 Ga. 226 (29 S. E. 273); Allen v. Schweigert, 113 Ga. 69 (38 S. E. 397); Western &c. R. Co. v. Third Nat. Bank, 125 Ga. 489 (54 S. E. 621) ; Southern Bell Telephone &c. Co. v. Glawson, 140 Ga. 507 (79 S. E. 136) ; Georgia Railway &c. Co. v. Decatur, 153 Ga. 330 (2) (111 S. E. 911); Towers v. City Land Co., 159 Ga. 486 (125 S. E. 837);…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GlawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Third National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Allen v. SchweigertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Town of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Ingram v. Trustees of Mercer UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- McGovern v. EckhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Schofield v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Howden v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Cox v. ZuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Clements v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.