Legal Opinion

Cox v. Zucker

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 7, 1958No. 19969PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

There is an enormous amount of space, both in the bill of exceptions and in the briefs of counsel, devoted to the presentation and argument as to whether or not the judgment denying a prayer for an interlocutory injunction, unexcepted to, became the law of the case, controlling or affecting the final judgment. In City of Atlanta v. First Methodist Church, 83 Ga. 448, 450 (10 S. E. 231), this court said: “It has been said that the decision of the superior court upon an interlocutory decree by the judge of that court, is not final, and is not conclusive between the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. First Christian Church v. Realty Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Fluker v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Holt v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Davis v. United American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  2. Eileen B. White & Associates, Inc. v. GunnellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Hasty v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  4. De Castro v. DurrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Gleaton v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API