Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Kirker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 51, Calendar No. 35,135PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The trial of a statutory issue in garnishment (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 13132) resulted in judgment for plaintiffs against the garnishee defendants, Roy Workman and Nina Workman, his wife, who bring error.

That there was indebtedness to the principal defendants was found by the trial judge, without a jury, by finding of fact and by conclusion of law, both of which are challenged.

The garnishee defendants, on November 19, 1928, agreed to purchase from principal defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Kirker, their vendees’ interest under a land contract. The remainder due on the contract and certain city taxes the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strohauer v. VoltzMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Kies v. WalworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Doane v. Feather's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Swarthout v. ShieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Dickman v. EndertMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McPherson v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In Re Estate of LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ehinger v. FiskeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Wilmarth v. BuysMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API