Legal Opinion
Edwards & Chamberlin Hardware Co. v. Pethick
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1930No. Docket No. 11, Calendar No. 34,156PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
This action is brought to recover on a promissory note, reading as follows:
“$645. Kalamazoo, Michigan, March 23, 1926.
“Six months after date we promise to pay to the order of The Edwards & Chamberlin Hardware Company, Kalamazoo, six hundred and forty-five and no-100 dollars at The First National Bank, Kalamazoo, Michigan. Value received with interest at 7 per cent, per annum. No undue influence or constraint has been exerted against Lulu Pethick in the execution of this instrument,”
and signed by both defendants, who are husband and wife. It was tried by the court without a jury. A judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cackley v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
3Cited by18 opinions
- In the Matter of Walter N. HUNTER, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of SHIPSHEWANA STATE BANKCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Michigan National Bank—Michiana v. Chrystler (In Re Trickett)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Albert Fetter and Mary Louise Fetter, His Wife, Jointly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Ritchie A. Harris v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- First Nat. Bank of Goodland v. PothuisjeIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.