Legal Opinion

In Re Conard

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 27, 1997No. 79212PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PRICE, Judge.

This is an unfortunate case in which two public officials, a circuit court judge and a city chief of police, faffed to properly exercise their duties. While each saw the speck in the other’s eye, each faffed to see the log in his own. It is our responsibility to determine whether the judge should be subject to discipline. Under the unique facts of the case, we find that the judge was guilty of misconduct in his official duties and should be suspended from office without pay for thirty days.

I

During the evening of November 29, 1995, Judge Frank A.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re Complaint Concerning MieraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. In Re EllistonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. In Re BaberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. In Re TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re: Boston's Children FirstCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  3. State Ex Rel. Lester E. Cox Medical Center v. WielandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. In Re HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Grace v. Missouri Gaming CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API