Legal Opinion

Reay v. Butler

California Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1893No. 14141PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a motion to strike” out or retax a memorandum of costs. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Appeal from an order of the superior court, by Mabel Treadwell, executrix of the will of J. P. Treadwell, deceased, denying appellant’s motion to strike out (or, in the alternative, to retax) a cost bill filed by plaintiff.

In 1866 the plaintiff, Eeay, commenced an action of ejectment against Butler and Owens to recover the possession of a tract of “outside lands” known as “Speck ranch.” J. P. Treadwell, appellant’s testator, filed an intervention in said action, alleging, in substance, that he was the owner and in possession of said ranch; that the defendants, Owens and Butler, were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte BurrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Muir v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frassi v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Reay v. HeazeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Leonis v. LeffingwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. McKinley v. National Citizens Bank of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API