Ex parte Burrill
California Supreme Court
Application for mandamus to the Judge of the Fifth Judicial District, San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Currey, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the District Judge of the Fifth Judicial District to vacate certain orders by him made in an action wherein L. Cohn was plaintiff and one Goldstein was defendant, and Knapp, Burrill & Co. were intervenors, occupying an antagonistic position to *351the plaintiff. The action was tried in San Joaquin County, in said district, and judgment was obtained there by the plaintiff against the interveners. From this judgment the intervenors appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, in December, 1863, reversed the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gray v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by11 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Brenton Bros. v. DorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Blair v. Brownstone Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.