Legal Opinion

Blair v. Infineon Technologies AG

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 29, 2010No. Civ. 09-295-SLRPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.

1. INTRODUCTION

On April 24, 2009, plaintiffs Lakita Blair, Linda Frazier, Bonnie Wright, Christopher Shull, Cheryl Maxey, Lawrence D. Meyer, Jacob Evans, Claude Edmonds, Brian Carey, John Earle, Kathleen Hall, and Olga Vaysman (collectively, “plaintiffs”), individually and as class representatives, 1 filed the present action against defendants Infineon Technologies AG (“Infineon AG”), Infineon Technologies North America Corporation (“Infineon North America”), and Qimonda AG (collectively, “defendants”). (D.I. 1) Plaintiffs are former employees…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Burtch v. Opus, LLC (In re Opus East, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015
  2. Soroof Trading Development Co. v. Ge Microgen, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. McBeth v. PorgesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Autobacs Strauss, Inc. v. Autobacs Seven Co. (In re Autobacs Strauss, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  5. National Gear & Piston, Inc. v. Cummins Power System, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API