Legal Opinion

Park v. Merrill Lynch

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 2003No. COA02-859PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Defendants, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.; Jeffrey J. Lane; Anthony (Mike) Cuomo; and Douglas Homberger, appeal an order of the trial court denying their motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration. They set forth three assignments of error. For the reasons discussed herein, we reverse and remand this case.

In 1986, plaintiff Park Family Dentistry established a working cash management account (WCMA) with Merrill Lynch. Between 1994 and 2000, plaintiffs David Park and Junhie Park established four individual retirement accounts (IRAs) with Merrill Lynch. On…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Carter v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. T.M.C.S., Inc. v. Marco Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Revels v. Miss America OrganizationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Burgess v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Register v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API