Legal Opinion

Revels v. Miss America Organization

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 2004No. COA03-1194PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

In this appeal, we must determine whether the trial court erred in denying defendant Miss America Organization’s (MAO) amended motion to compel arbitration of the dispute between MAO and plaintiff Rebekah Chantay Revels. For the reasons stated herein, we conclude that the trial court did not err, and we affirm the trial court’s order.

The factual and procedural background is as follows: On 22 June 2002, plaintiff was designated “Miss North Carolina 2002” by defendant Miss North Carolina Pageant Organization, Inc. (MNCPO) after winning a public contest sponsored by MNCPO. MNCPO is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED v. Willard S. HARTMANN, Leona R. Hartmann, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Slaughter v. SwicegoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hager v. Smithfield E. Health Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. Raper v. Oliver House, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Brown v. Centex HomesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Revels v. Miss America OrganizationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API