Legal Opinion
Durfey v. United States Sec'y of Agriculture
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 22, 2008No. Court No. 06-00316Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
POGUE, Judge:
This case returns to court after a voluntary remand to the Department of Agriculture (“Department”). Upon remand, Defendant United States Secretary of Agriculture (“the Secretary”) found Plaintiffs Ted and Pam Durfey DBA Lighthouse Ranch (“the Durfeys” or “Plaintiffs”) ineligible for Trade Adjustment Assistance (“TAA”) benefits,1 claiming that Plaintiffs failed to show that they had suffered a decrease in net farm income from the pre-adjustment year of 2003 to the applicable marketing year of 2004.
*472Jurisdiction
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. United States Sec'y of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Ron Steen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Anderson v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.