Legal Opinion
149 Madison Avenue Corp. v. Asselta
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 16, 1947No. 497PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vinson
This employee suit was brought in the District Court to recover overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and a reasonable attorney’s fee pursuant to §§ 7 (a) and 16 (b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Recovery was allowed in the District Court, 65 F. Supp. 385, and that judgment was affirmed in the Circuit Court of Appeals. 156 F. 2d 139. We granted certiorari to consider the important questions presented relating to the application of the overtime provisions of the above-mentioned statute.
Respondents are service and maintenance employees who, during the period in question, worked…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walling v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Sharpe v. CuretonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Urnikis-Negro v. American Family Property ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Sharpe v. CuretonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Mumbower v. CallicottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.