United Behavioral Health v. Maricopa Integrated Health System
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Judge:
¶ 1 This appeal presents the question of whether two health care providers, Aurora Behavioral Healthcare (“Aurora”) and Maricopa Integrated Health System (“MIHS”) (collectively the “Providers”), may compel arbitration of coverage claims arising under Medicare and ERISA health care plans. The Providers seek to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in their agreement with United Behavioral Health (“UBH”), the entity which administers the subject Medicare and ERISA benefit plans. The arbitration clause is expressly governed by the Federal Arbitration Act…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Montefiore Medical Center v. Teamsters Local 272Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Behavioral Health v. Maricopa Integrated Health SystemArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- United Behavioral Health v. Maricopa Integrated Health SystemArizona Supreme Court · 2016