Wiseman v. Wiseman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
The precise nature of the questions presented by petitioner Doris Wiseman’s appeal is rendered uncertain by virtue of the fact that petitioner has failed to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure in preparing the record on appeal and the brief supporting her position on the questions presented. Petitioner has violated App. R. 9(b)(l)(xi) and App. R. 10 by failing to set out any exceptions immediately following the record of the judicial action to which they are addressed and by failing to list all the objections or exceptions upon which the assignments of error set out at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chalmers v. WomackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Kearney v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- GLEN FOREST CORPORATION v. BenschCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Marsico v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Gibbs v. DukeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Steingress v. SteingressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Slaughter v. SwicegoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Lawton v. County of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Commissioner of Labor v. Weekley Homes, L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Barnard v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.