Watson v. Sutro
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an appeal by Adolph Sutro from that portion of a judgment in partition proceedings that awards to the plaintiff in the action. an attorney’s fee of $5,000. In the trial of the action of partition the amount of the respective equitable interests of plaintiff and appellant Sutro to the realty involved in the litigation was warmly contested, and as to such matters the litigation resulted adversely to this appellant.
At the hearing, the report of the referees was acquiesced in by all the parties in interest, and the only contest that was made was as to the amount which should be allowed to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Pennie v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Capuccio v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Clancy v. PloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bohan v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.