Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Follansbee

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 2004No. 981006; A116881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Plaintiffs filed a statutory proceeding to partition real property. They appeal from a judgment that dismissed their claims. The trial court reasoned that plaintiffs had waived their right to seek partition of the property by signing an agreement to convey their undivided shares of the property into a common trust. Although governed by statute, partition is an equitable remedy, and our review is de novo. ORS 19.415(3); Maupin v. Opie, 156 Or App 52, 964 P2d 1117, rev den, 328 Or 194 (1998). We conclude that the trial court erred in dismissing the claims and reverse the judgment and remand for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. McMillan v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Glover v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Berger v. StephanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. In re the Marriage of PollockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Reach Community Development v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Colorado Korean Ass'n v. KOREAN SEN. ASS'N.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API