Legal Opinion

Hegel v. Kuhlman Bros., Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1989No. 16965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission finding claimant to be totally and permanently disabled under the odd-lot doctrine, and apportioning liability for the non-medical portion of the disability between the employer’s surety and the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund. Only the Special Indemnity Fund appeals the decision of the Industrial Commission. We affirm.

Claimant Hegel is now 67 years of age. He attended school through the eighth grade and his reading ability is fair. Sub*856stantially all of his life has been spent in the logging industry. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Carey v. Clearwater County Road DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Arnold v. Splendid BakeryIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Gordon v. WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Snyder v. Burl C. Lange, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lethrud v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ball v. Daw Forest Products Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ragan v. Kenaston Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hegel v. Kuhlman Bros., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API