Legal Opinion

Ball v. Daw Forest Products Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2001No. 26050PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

Duane Ball (Ball) appeals from the Industrial Commission’s (Commission) decision that he suffered a fifty percent disability rather than a total and permanent disability. Ball also claims that the Industrial Commission made several legal and procedural errors.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

At the time of the hearing, Ball was thirty-nine years old and lived in Blanchard, Idaho. Blanchard is a small town located on Highway 41 about thirty-one miles north of Post Falls, thirty-nine miles southwest of Sand-point and twelve miles south of Priest River.

In 1986 Ball began…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kinney v. Tupperware Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Madron v. Green Giant CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Evans v. Hara's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Swanson v. Kraft, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Fonseca v. Corral Agriculture, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Roy Green v. Industrial Special IndemnityIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Sharp v. Thomas Bros PlumbingIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Warren v. Williams & Parsons PC CPASIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API