Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Finazzo
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 27, 2008No. Misc. Action 18-304 (HB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HAROLD BAER, JR., Part I District Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) has applied to this Court to enforce administrative subpoenas issued to respondents Christopher Finazzo (“Finazzo”) and South Bay Apparel, Inc. (“South Bay”) in connection with the Commission’s non-public investigation, In the Matter of Aéropostale, Inc. (the “Aéropos-tale Investigation”). At the argument on March 25, 2008, Finazzo urged this Court to deny the Commission’s application outright or, alternatively, to hold the Commission’s application in abeyance while Finaz-zo…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,017 Securities and Exchange Commission, and Cross-Appellant v. Brigadoon Scotch Distributing Co., and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In Re Asia Global Crossing, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. FinazzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. FinazzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009