Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Finazzo

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 8, 2009No. Nos. 08-1733-cv (L), 08-3995-cv (Con)Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Respondent-Appellant Christopher Finazzo appeals from two separate orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued in two separate actions, concerning the validity of an administrative subpoena issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in response to public disclosures by Finazzo’s former employer — Aéropostale, Inc., (“Aéropostale”) — based upon allegedly privileged and misappropriated information. By the first order, the district court (Harold Baer, Jr., Part I Judge) granted the SEC’s application to enforce its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Sprecher v. GraberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API