Legal Opinion

Harbich v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 3, 1932No. 57PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNERLY, District Judge.

July 17,1931, plaintiffs, alleged to be citizens of Texas, sued defendants (tbe Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company being alleged to be a “foreign corporation,” and Crow being alleged to be a resident of Texas) in the district court of Victoria county, Tex.,_ for damages for alleged personal injuries, etc., arising out of an alleged collision between an automobile owned and driven by plaintiffs, or one of them, and an automobile alleged to be owned by defendant shoe company, and driven by defendant Crow. It is alleged that such injuries were caused by the negligence of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Creager v. P. F. Collier & Son Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Clements v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1989
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Lone Star Package Car Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1952
  4. International Shoe Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Lee v. Memphis Pub. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API