Lee v. Memphis Pub. Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
Roberds, J.,
delivered a dissenting opinion.
It is, to say the least, taxing the credulity of the ordinary mind to say that the Commercial Appeal is not “doing any business,” or performing “any character of work or service” in Mississippi. It has what are called distributors in the various vicinities of the state, a part of whose contractual duties is to “Use every reasonable effort to retain all purchasers and to increase the number of purchasers of The Commercial Appeal in the above town”; to sell and deliver the paper promptly to purchasers, newsboys and news-stands “at the regular rates ’ ’…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Forman v. Mississippi Publishers Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1943
- American Asphalt Roof Corp. v. ShanklandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Neyens v. WorthingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.