Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. Alexanderson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 24, 1990No. 87 Civ. 8099 (RPP)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff Saul Shapiro (“Shapiro”) moves for reargument of that part of the Opinion and Order of July 9, 1990 (“Opinion”) 741 F.Supp. 472 in the above captioned case which denied the portion of Shapiro’s motion for summary judgment which sought “a declaration that defendant County of Putnam [ (“County") ] is a responsible party within the meaning of [the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act] CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(2).” PL Notice of Motion.
As related in detail in the Opinion, this is a CERCLA action…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- O'NEIL v. PicilloDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1988
- United States v. StringfellowDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
- United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1988
- United States v. Northernaire Plating Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distribution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Chatham Steel Corp. v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1994
- Lincoln Properties, Ltd. v. HigginsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1992
- Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
- United States v. a & N Cleaners and Launderers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.