Legal Opinion
United States v. Northernaire Plating Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided April 30, 1987No. G84-1113 CA7PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTIONS
HILLMAN, Chief Judge.
Presently before this court are several matters upon which oral arguments were heard on Tuesday, March 24, 1987. The underlying action is a suit filed by the United States against Northernaire Plating Company (“Northernaire”), Willard S. Garwood (“Garwood”) and R.W. Meyer, Inc. (“Meyer”) which seeks to recover costs expended by the government in undertaking an “Immediate Removal Action.” The action was taken to remove hazardous substances from a site where Northernaire had operated an electroplating business for a period of about ten years. This lawsuit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. R.W. Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. R.W. Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Amland Properties Corp. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- In the Matter of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, Appeal of Washington State Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.