Legal Opinion
O'NEIL v. Picillo
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided March 8, 1988No. Civ. A. 83-0787 PPublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETTINE, Senior District Judge.
The State of Rhode Island (“State”) seeks to hold the defendants jointly and severally liable for one million six hundred and thirteen thousand four hundred and thirty-seven dollars and thirty cents ($1,613,437.30) it expended in cleaning up a hazardous waste site in Coventry, Rhode Island known as the Picillo Pig Farm; it also asks this Court to declare that the defendants must respond in damages for all remedial costs it may incur in the future in the investigation and remediation of damages to the State’s natural resources allegedly resulting from the…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Marisol, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Amland Properties Corp. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.