Langley v. DURHAM LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF RALEIGH, NC
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Defendant assigns as error the denial of its timely motion (s) for judgment of nonsuit. In passing upon this assignment, the admitted opinion testimony of Harvey, whether competent or incompetent, must be considered. Early v. Eley, 243 N.C. 695, 700, 91 S.E. 2d 919, and cases cited; Kientz v. Carlton, 245 N.C. 236, 246, 96 S.E. 2d 14.
“Where ... a policy provides for indemnity for injuries inflicted by external, violent, ‘and’ accidental means, to support a recovery it must be shown not only that the means were external and violent, but also that they were accidental — that is, all three tests…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Early v. EleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Fallins v. Durham Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Fletcher v. Security Life & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Slaughter v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Keith v. United Cities Gas CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Chesson v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Henderson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Horn v. Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Safeguard Insurance Co. v. Wilmington Cold Storage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.