Legal Opinion

Fallins v. Durham Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1957No. 96PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The defendant’s exception to the instructions and its motion for nonsuit raise the same question — the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury.

In cases of this character “the plaintiff, to establish a prima facie case, must prove (1) the existence of the contract or policy sued on; (2) the death of the insured or the happening of the event provided for in the policy, and the giving of notice and proof of death (or other event), as required by the policy. On the other hand, the burden is on the company to show a violation of conditions avoiding an otherwise valid policy, or exceptions in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Price v. Occidental Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Mutual Life Insurance v. DistrettiTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Powers v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Pacific Indemnity Company v. KohlhaseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Bailey Ex Rel. First National Bank of Catawba County, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. McAbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Slaughter v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API