Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Manley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1899No. 3176PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Thomas Carroll, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, C. J.

Plaintiffs are wholesale dealers in tobacco, residing in Chicago. The defendants are cigar manufacturers, residing in. Tacoma, in this state. The action was brought to recover the balance due on an account. Por a counterclaim, defendants alleged that, by an oral agreement made on July 18, 1896, at the city of Tacoma, the plaintiffs sold and agreed to deliver to defendants at Tacoma ten bales of Havana tobacco, according to *44sample; that on the 14th of September, 1896, the plaintiffs, for a valuable consideration, sold and agreed to deliver…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rotting v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Holgate v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Patton v. BarnettWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hardman Estate v. McNairWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Friedman v. ManleyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Burger v. CovertWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Colvin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API